Diffuse Retinal Thickening due to Epiretinal Membrane in a Patient with Idiopathic Parafoveal Telangiectasia
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Case Report
VOLUME: 7 ISSUE: 1
P: 77 - 79
January 2019

Diffuse Retinal Thickening due to Epiretinal Membrane in a Patient with Idiopathic Parafoveal Telangiectasia

Bezmialem Science 2019;7(1):77-79
1. Bezmialem Vakıf University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İstanbul, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 04.10.2017
Accepted Date: 13.11.2017
Publish Date: 28.02.2019
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasia (IPT) is characterized by abnormal dilated or ectatic retinal capillaries with exudation. In many studies macular hole or pseudohole was demonstrated in patients with IPT. However, only one case with the coexistence of IPT and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation was reported before. In this study, we presented the retinal alterations of a patient with IPT admitted to our clinic with complaint of blurred vision for two months. A hyperreflective band refers to ERM, diffuse thickening and increased reflectance of inner retinal layers and cystic spaces in the inner nuclear layer of the retina were detected in horizontal optic coherence tomography (OCT) images of left eye. Due to the thickening of the inner retinal layers, foveal depression was lost. There was no full-thickness or partial-thickness retinal tissue defect in any OCT scan.

Keywords:
Idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasia, epiretinal membrane, optic coherence tomography

Introduction

Idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasia (IPT) is characterized by abnormal dilated or ectatic retinal capillaries with exudation in one or both eyes. The term IPT was first used by Gass and Oyakawa (1) in 1982. The classification of the disease was established by Gass and Blodi (2) according to clinical and fundus fluorescein angiography findings. In following years, macular hole or pseudohole was demonstrated in patients with IPT in many studies (3,4). However, only one case with the coexistence of IPT and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation was reported before (5). In this case report, we presented ERM formation and related retinal alterations in a patient with IPT.

Discussion

The pathophysiology of IPT is not fully understood. In the early studies, it was thought that retinal capillaries were primarily responsible for the disease, and in the subsequent studies, it was suggested that chronic liquid leakage could lead to metabolic deterioration and cell death, especially in Muller cells and photoreceptors (6). It was also suggested that chronic retinal ischemia may play role in Muller cell destruction (6). Muller cells have an astrocyte-like function; supporting nerve cells in the retina capillary endothelium and surrounding nerve cells, and extend from the photoresporter cell layer to the inner limiting membrane. Destruction of Muller cells in IPT is known to lead to the development of macular hole or pseudohole. There are many studies in the literature showing development of full-thickness or partial-thickness retinal tissue defects as well as macular holes or pseudoholes in patients with IPT (3). It was reported that in some of those patients, ERM accompanied macular hole or pseudohole. Diffuse retinal thickening was described in primary ERM before and it was described in ERM due to IPT only in one patient. In the article by Gomes et al., (5) a 46-year-old female patient with IPT was reported to have ERM and diffuse retinal thickening in both eyes and it was emphasized that their patient was the first patient with diffuse retinal thickening and ERM due to IPT reported in the literature. In that patient, diffuse thickening of the inner layers of the retina due to ERM in both eyes and large hyporeflective cavitation in the outer layers of the retina which suggested serous macular detachment were observed. In our patient, ERM and diffuse retinal thickening without any retinal tissue defect were observed. However, unlike in the patient reported by Gomes et al., (5) cystic cavities were detected in the inner nuclear layer of the retina in our patient. This is not usual in primary ERM. Probably, leakage from telangiectasic vessels caused cystic formations. It should also be kept in mind that, due to the patient’s age, epiretinal membrane might not be secondary. The presence of cystic cavities that are not seen in patients with primary ERM and the presence of ERM, especially in the region of telangiectasic vessels support the relationship between ERM and IPT. But, only one patient reported in this case report is a limitation. Similar case series or studies with larger number of patients will provide more information.

References

1
Gass JD, Oyakawa RT. Idiopathic juxtafoveal retinal telangiectasis. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:769-80.
2
Gass JD, Blodi BA. Idiopathic juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis. Update of classification and follow-up study. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1536-46.
3
Surguch V, Gamulescu MA, Gabel VP. Optical coherence tomography findings in idiopathic juxtafoveal retinal telangiectasis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:783-8.
4
Özkaya A, Ünver YB, Acar N, Kapran Z. İki tip 2a jukstafoveal retinal telenjiektazi olgusunda fundus görüntüleme bulguları. Ret-Vit 2012;20:146-50.
5
Gomes FV, Felix JPF, Nascimento MA, Lira RPC. Epiretinal membrane formation associated with idiopathic macular telangiectasia: case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2014;77:264-6.
6
Yannuzzi LA, Bardal AM, Freund KB, Chen KJ, Eandi CM, Blodi B. Idiopathic macular telangiectasia. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:450-60.